From a6f3fc45ba0e923f45aa3f47ba6a58139138e418 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Ryan C. Gordon" <icculus@icculus.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 07:20:12 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] From Mike Frysinger and/or Gentoo:

- libsdl-SDL_stretch-PIC.patch
ignoring the general fact of how SDL_stretch relies on executing dynamic code,
the inline asm should let gcc handle the a details for getting the actual
address for _copy_row as it will do the right thing
test case: http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/libsdl/sdl-stretch.tar.bz2
---
 src/video/SDL_stretch.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/video/SDL_stretch.c b/src/video/SDL_stretch.c
index 80d529206..1535dd332 100644
--- a/src/video/SDL_stretch.c
+++ b/src/video/SDL_stretch.c
@@ -286,9 +286,9 @@ int SDL_SoftStretch(SDL_Surface *src, SDL_Rect *srcrect,
 		    default:
 #ifdef __GNUC__
 			__asm__ __volatile__ (
-			"call _copy_row"
+			"call *%4"
 			: "=&D" (u1), "=&S" (u2)
-			: "0" (dstp), "1" (srcp)
+			: "0" (dstp), "1" (srcp), "r" (&_copy_row)
 			: "memory" );
 #else
 #ifdef WIN32