slouken@10486
|
1 |
Dynamic API
|
slouken@10486
|
2 |
================================================================================
|
slouken@10486
|
3 |
Originally posted by Ryan at:
|
slouken@10486
|
4 |
https://plus.google.com/103391075724026391227/posts/TB8UfnDYu4U
|
slouken@10486
|
5 |
|
slouken@10486
|
6 |
Background:
|
slouken@10486
|
7 |
|
slouken@10486
|
8 |
- The Steam Runtime has (at least in theory) a really kick-ass build of SDL2,
|
slouken@10486
|
9 |
but developers are shipping their own SDL2 with individual Steam games.
|
slouken@10486
|
10 |
These games might stop getting updates, but a newer SDL2 might be needed later.
|
slouken@10486
|
11 |
Certainly we'll always be fixing bugs in SDL, even if a new video target isn't
|
slouken@10486
|
12 |
ever needed, and these fixes won't make it to a game shipping its own SDL.
|
slouken@10486
|
13 |
- Even if we replace the SDL2 in those games with a compatible one, that is to
|
slouken@10486
|
14 |
say, edit a developer's Steam depot (yuck!), there are developers that are
|
slouken@10486
|
15 |
statically linking SDL2 that we can't do this for. We can't even force the
|
slouken@10486
|
16 |
dynamic loader to ignore their SDL2 in this case, of course.
|
slouken@10486
|
17 |
- If you don't ship an SDL2 with the game in some form, people that disabled the
|
slouken@10486
|
18 |
Steam Runtime, or just tried to run the game from the command line instead of
|
slouken@10486
|
19 |
Steam might find themselves unable to run the game, due to a missing dependency.
|
slouken@10486
|
20 |
- If you want to ship on non-Steam platforms like GOG or Humble Bundle, or target
|
slouken@10486
|
21 |
generic Linux boxes that may or may not have SDL2 installed, you have to ship
|
slouken@10486
|
22 |
the library or risk a total failure to launch. So now, you might have to have
|
slouken@10486
|
23 |
a non-Steam build plus a Steam build (that is, one with and one without SDL2
|
slouken@10486
|
24 |
included), which is inconvenient if you could have had one universal build
|
slouken@10486
|
25 |
that works everywhere.
|
slouken@10486
|
26 |
- We like the zlib license, but the biggest complaint from the open source
|
slouken@10486
|
27 |
community about the license change is the static linking. The LGPL forced this
|
slouken@10486
|
28 |
as a legal, not technical issue, but zlib doesn't care. Even those that aren't
|
slouken@10486
|
29 |
concerned about the GNU freedoms found themselves solving the same problems:
|
slouken@10486
|
30 |
swapping in a newer SDL to an older game often times can save the day.
|
slouken@10486
|
31 |
Static linking stops this dead.
|
slouken@10486
|
32 |
|
slouken@10486
|
33 |
So here's what we did:
|
slouken@10486
|
34 |
|
slouken@10486
|
35 |
SDL now has, internally, a table of function pointers. So, this is what SDL_Init
|
slouken@10486
|
36 |
now looks like:
|
slouken@10486
|
37 |
|
slouken@10486
|
38 |
UInt32 SDL_Init(Uint32 flags)
|
slouken@10486
|
39 |
{
|
slouken@10486
|
40 |
return jump_table.SDL_Init(flags);
|
slouken@10486
|
41 |
}
|
slouken@10486
|
42 |
|
slouken@10486
|
43 |
Except that is all done with a bunch of macro magic so we don't have to maintain
|
slouken@10486
|
44 |
every one of these.
|
slouken@10486
|
45 |
|
slouken@10486
|
46 |
What is jump_table.SDL_init()? Eventually, that's a function pointer of the real
|
slouken@10486
|
47 |
SDL_Init() that you've been calling all this time. But at startup, it looks more
|
slouken@10486
|
48 |
like this:
|
slouken@10486
|
49 |
|
slouken@10486
|
50 |
Uint32 SDL_Init_DEFAULT(Uint32 flags)
|
slouken@10486
|
51 |
{
|
slouken@10486
|
52 |
SDL_InitDynamicAPI();
|
slouken@10486
|
53 |
return jump_table.SDL_Init(flags);
|
slouken@10486
|
54 |
}
|
slouken@10486
|
55 |
|
slouken@10486
|
56 |
SDL_InitDynamicAPI() fills in jump_table with all the actual SDL function
|
slouken@10486
|
57 |
pointers, which means that this _DEFAULT function never gets called again.
|
slouken@10486
|
58 |
First call to any SDL function sets the whole thing up.
|
slouken@10486
|
59 |
|
slouken@10486
|
60 |
So you might be asking, what was the value in that? Isn't this what the operating
|
slouken@10486
|
61 |
system's dynamic loader was supposed to do for us? Yes, but now we've got this
|
slouken@10486
|
62 |
level of indirection, we can do things like this:
|
slouken@10486
|
63 |
|
slouken@10486
|
64 |
export SDL_DYNAMIC_API=/my/actual/libSDL-2.0.so.0
|
slouken@10486
|
65 |
./MyGameThatIsStaticallyLinkedToSDL2
|
slouken@10486
|
66 |
|
slouken@10486
|
67 |
And now, this game that is staticallly linked to SDL, can still be overridden
|
slouken@10486
|
68 |
with a newer, or better, SDL. The statically linked one will only be used as
|
slouken@10486
|
69 |
far as calling into the jump table in this case. But in cases where no override
|
slouken@10486
|
70 |
is desired, the statically linked version will provide its own jump table,
|
slouken@10486
|
71 |
and everyone is happy.
|
slouken@10486
|
72 |
|
slouken@10486
|
73 |
So now:
|
slouken@10486
|
74 |
- Developers can statically link SDL, and users can still replace it.
|
slouken@10486
|
75 |
(We'd still rather you ship a shared library, though!)
|
slouken@10486
|
76 |
- Developers can ship an SDL with their game, Valve can override it for, say,
|
slouken@10486
|
77 |
new features on SteamOS, or distros can override it for their own needs,
|
slouken@10486
|
78 |
but it'll also just work in the default case.
|
slouken@10486
|
79 |
- Developers can ship the same package to everyone (Humble Bundle, GOG, etc),
|
slouken@10486
|
80 |
and it'll do the right thing.
|
slouken@10486
|
81 |
- End users (and Valve) can update a game's SDL in almost any case,
|
slouken@10486
|
82 |
to keep abandoned games running on newer platforms.
|
slouken@10486
|
83 |
- Everyone develops with SDL exactly as they have been doing all along.
|
slouken@10486
|
84 |
Same headers, same ABI. Just get the latest version to enable this magic.
|
slouken@10486
|
85 |
|
slouken@10486
|
86 |
|
slouken@10486
|
87 |
A little more about SDL_InitDynamicAPI():
|
slouken@10486
|
88 |
|
slouken@10486
|
89 |
Internally, InitAPI does some locking to make sure everything waits until a
|
slouken@10486
|
90 |
single thread initializes everything (although even SDL_CreateThread() goes
|
slouken@10486
|
91 |
through here before spinning a thread, too), and then decides if it should use
|
slouken@10486
|
92 |
an external SDL library. If not, it sets up the jump table using the current
|
slouken@10486
|
93 |
SDL's function pointers (which might be statically linked into a program, or in
|
slouken@10486
|
94 |
a shared library of its own). If so, it loads that library and looks for and
|
slouken@10486
|
95 |
calls a single function:
|
slouken@10486
|
96 |
|
slouken@10486
|
97 |
SInt32 SDL_DYNAPI_entry(Uint32 version, void *table, Uint32 tablesize);
|
slouken@10486
|
98 |
|
slouken@10486
|
99 |
That function takes a version number (more on that in a moment), the address of
|
slouken@10486
|
100 |
the jump table, and the size, in bytes, of the table.
|
slouken@10486
|
101 |
Now, we've got policy here: this table's layout never changes; new stuff gets
|
slouken@10486
|
102 |
added to the end. Therefore SDL_DYNAPI_entry() knows that it can provide all
|
slouken@10486
|
103 |
the needed functions if tablesize <= sizeof its own jump table. If tablesize is
|
slouken@10486
|
104 |
bigger (say, SDL 2.0.4 is trying to load SDL 2.0.3), then we know to abort, but
|
slouken@10486
|
105 |
if it's smaller, we know we can provide the entire API that the caller needs.
|
slouken@10486
|
106 |
|
slouken@10486
|
107 |
The version variable is a failsafe switch.
|
slouken@10486
|
108 |
Right now it's always 1. This number changes when there are major API changes
|
slouken@10486
|
109 |
(so we know if the tablesize might be smaller, or entries in it have changed).
|
slouken@10486
|
110 |
Right now SDL_DYNAPI_entry gives up if the version doesn't match, but it's not
|
slouken@10486
|
111 |
inconceivable to have a small dispatch library that only supplies this one
|
slouken@10486
|
112 |
function and loads different, otherwise-incompatible SDL libraries and has the
|
slouken@10486
|
113 |
right one initialize the jump table based on the version. For something that
|
slouken@10486
|
114 |
must generically catch lots of different versions of SDL over time, like the
|
slouken@10486
|
115 |
Steam Client, this isn't a bad option.
|
slouken@10486
|
116 |
|
slouken@10486
|
117 |
Finally, I'm sure some people are reading this and thinking,
|
slouken@10486
|
118 |
"I don't want that overhead in my project!"
|
slouken@10486
|
119 |
To which I would point out that the extra function call through the jump table
|
slouken@10486
|
120 |
probably wouldn't even show up in a profile, but lucky you: this can all be
|
slouken@10486
|
121 |
disabled. You can build SDL without this if you absolutely must, but we would
|
slouken@10486
|
122 |
encourage you not to do that. However, on heavily locked down platforms like
|
slouken@10486
|
123 |
iOS, or maybe when debugging, it makes sense to disable it. The way this is
|
slouken@10486
|
124 |
designed in SDL, you just have to change one #define, and the entire system
|
slouken@10486
|
125 |
vaporizes out, and SDL functions exactly like it always did. Most of it is
|
slouken@10486
|
126 |
macro magic, so the system is contained to one C file and a few headers.
|
slouken@10486
|
127 |
However, this is on by default and you have to edit a header file to turn it
|
slouken@10486
|
128 |
off. Our hopes is that if we make it easy to disable, but not too easy,
|
slouken@10486
|
129 |
everyone will ultimately be able to get what they want, but we've gently
|
slouken@10486
|
130 |
nudged everyone towards what we think is the best solution.
|